RoundUp the herbicide that alters genes
A friend called me earlier today and needed me to collaborate on a comment he is going to make on a U.S. Navy environmental impact report. Specifically, they want to use RoundUp to knock down trees near the power lines in his community. Our local water agency here does not want to use it because of some problems that have come to light about it. In fact, I have been preparing some information for them on the topic - to support their unwillingness to use it. Even though we allow its use on food crops!
You can Google it and find some things out but is largely non-technical.
For example:
“Medical
reports link exposure to glyphosate herbicides with short-term symptoms
including blurred vision, skin problems, heart palpitations, and nausea.
Studies have also found associations with increased risk of miscarriages,
premature birth, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and diabetes. Formulations in which
glyphosate is combined with other ingredients can be more acutely toxic than
glyphosate alone (6, pgs. 5-8). Monsanto, a major manufacturer of
glyphosate-based herbicides, was challenged by the Attorney General of New York
State for making safety claims similar to those now being repeated by the U.S.
State Department. In an out-of-court settlement in 1996, Monsanto agreed to
stop advertising the product as "safe, non-toxic, harmless or free from
risk”.
“New
York State's Attorney General has sued Monsanto for claiming that RoundUp is
"safe" and "environmentally friendly." This suit
ended in a settlement with Monsanto in which Monsanto agreed to cease and
desist from using these terms in advertising RoundUp in the state of New
York. Monsanto, while not admitting any wrongdoing, paid the state of New
York $250,000 in settlement of this suit. When Monsanto violated the
first settlement agreement by advertising within New York that RoundUp is
"safe," a second agreement was negotiated.”
No comments:
Post a Comment